I imagine that we were all wondering, to a greater or lesser degree, about when Joost van der Westhuizen would finally confess to starring in the infamous sex video featuring him apparently receiving oral sex and sniffing CAT.
After months and months of denial, that day came today when the former Springbok rugby captain announced that it *was*, in fact, him.
Let us not all faint at once from non-astonishment.
It should come as no surprise that Joost made this confession now, just ahead of the release of his book ‘Spieelbeeld’ (directly translated as ‘mirror image’, according to Hyphenator – the English version of the book is called ‘Joost: The Man in the Mirror’), in which (Rapport newspaper alleges) Joost relates the anguish he experienced after the story was made public, complements of Heat magazine.
Rapport quotes him as saying, “The fact that I was living a lie was eating me up inside.
One can be certain that hundreds more copies of his book will be purchased now that people know they’ll be getting a version of the truth that we all knew, anyway. An extremely sneaky ploy – perhaps Joost is trying to get all the cash he can should his wife decide to divorce him.
The bit in the Rapport story that made me snort was Joost’s decision to visit local evangelist ‘uncle Angus’ Buchan in June, with his wife Amor and their children, to ask for advice. “Uncle Angus made me realise that I must stand up and be a pillar for my family,” the ex-rugby star said.
It’s unclear what this holy directive meant to Joost, though. Perhaps it meant publicly lying to his wife for a further one to two months until August, or blaming dark forces around him while threatening to sue various magazine editors and the like for fabricating this story.
Perhaps, too, it meant remaining in cahoots with ex-bouncer and current private investigator – and current liar – Mike Bolhuis. When the story first broke, Bolhuis said Joost had passed a polygraph test “with flying colours”.
Then, in March this year, when Joost decided to drop extortion and defamation charges regarding the video, as well as civil action against Heat and Rapport, Bolhuis the lackey said a number of factors had led to the decision to advise his client against taking action: “…(on) reflection we realise that such claims, given South Africa’s weak judicial system, could be stretched out for a long time. Every time something happens in court, the media reports on it, and the whole unsavoury incident is dredged up again. “
Ah yes, that pesky “we’re lying and going to be found out if we go to court” rationale.
So Joost was unfaithful. Who gives a fig?
Why he decided to turn it into such a palaver once he was found out, is what sticks in my throat. Who is going to trust him again?